国资委某负责人向记者证实,“此次《试行办法》正式公布的文稿只是对市场长期以来所期待的样式作了极少数的提法和文字上的修改及调整,实质性改动几乎为零。”这无疑指出了两个方面的信息:一是《试行办法》在决策者眼里其实早已设计成熟,具备试水的基本条件;二是监管层对此确实存有诸多顾虑,不得不慎之又慎,长期在得失与风险中小心权衡,导致其真正实施延宕至今。粗粗算来,我国新法规新办法的推出层出不穷,但是像如此股权激励新政一样非得历经七年之痒才能大白于天下的现象却也是数见不鲜,探寻个中原因其实很直白,无非是该项新政已然极大地冲击着人们的公众心理,进而扯拽到广垠的社会层面,甚至引发了公平公正等社会的伦理话题。此番股权激励就很有代表意义,其已经把上市公司单纯的激励机制远远地甩在了事实背后,扎扎实实地一头扎入关于分配社会财富的深水区。 A responsible person of SASAC confirmed to reporters: “The official announcement of the” Trial Measures “is only a very small number of references and written modifications and adjustments to the style the market has long been expecting. The substantive changes are almost zero . ”This undoubtedly points out two aspects of the message: First, the“ pilot measures ”have in fact been designed well by policy makers and have the basic conditions for water testing; second, there are indeed many concerns that regulators have to this effect and must be cautious Careful, long-term balance between gains and losses and risks, leading to its actual implementation so far. Rough estimate, China’s new regulations and new methods introduced an endless stream, but like the New Deal of equity incentives must have gone through seven years of itch to the world phenomenon is also a few see nothing, to explore the reason is very straightforward, nothing more It is this new policy that has already greatly affected people’s public psychology and then dragged down to the vast social sphere and even triggered social ethics issues such as fairness and justice. This equity incentive is very representative of the significance of the incentive mechanism of listed companies has been left behind the fact far behind, solidly plunged into the deep-water area on the distribution of social wealth.