论文部分内容阅读
客观性证据审查模式在实践中被基层检察院公诉部门越来越多的采用,传统的过于倚重犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的口供定案,以及对客观性证据的收集和证明价值的重视不足,有时为刑事错案埋下伏笔。这就需要言词证据与客观性证据相结合,并且特别重视客观性证据的审查与采信。结合司法实践,对客观性证据审查模式适用中的关键问题进行分析,以期对此制度的完善有所裨益。
In practice, the mode of objectivity of evidence review is adopted more and more by public prosecutorial departments of grass-roots procuratorates. The traditional reliance on criminal confessions and defendants’ confessions and the insufficient attention paid to the evidence of objectivity and the value of proof are sometimes Criminal mishandling paving the way. This requires a combination of verbal and objectivity evidence, with special emphasis on the examination and acceptance of objectivity evidence. Combining with the judicial practice, this paper analyzes the key issues in the application of the objectivity evidence review mode in the hope of improving the system.