论文部分内容阅读
在眼科门诊实践中,我们发现小孔验光与散瞳验光有时结果不尽一致,而且这种差异性与年龄及其他因素有一定关系。为了摸清其规律性,近1年内,笔者进行了大、小孔验光对比,并进行了初步分析,现报告如下。一、对象与方法检查对象均为眼科门诊屈光不正者,计142人,277眼。年龄最小3(1/2)岁,最大60岁。根据临床标准将患者分为6岁以下、6～12岁、13～18岁、18岁以上四个年龄组。
In the practice of ophthalmic clinics, we found that the results of small hole optometry and cycloplegic refraction sometimes are not consistent, and this difference has some relationship with age and other factors. In order to find out its regularity, the author conducted a large, small hole optometry contrast, and conducted a preliminary analysis, the report is as follows. First, the object and method of examination are eye clinic refractive errors, accounting for 142 people, 277 eyes. The youngest 3 (1/2) years old, maximum 60 years old. According to clinical criteria, patients were divided into 6 years old, 6 to 12 years old, 13 to 18 years old, 18 years old and above four age groups.