论文部分内容阅读
为确保过程性评价的科学、规范,减少随意性、主观性,十一学校强调评价指标的描述要具体、可操作、可量化。评价采取定性与定量相结合,既有分数的评价,又有描述性语言的评价。以思想政治Ⅰ为例(见表9),这门课程是十一学校课程体系中人文领域的Ⅰ类课程,适合于工程经济学和数理方向的学生学习,达到毕业要求水平。由于摆脱了高考所需大量知识点的背诵和记忆,Ⅰ类课程有了较大的拓展空间,实施“话题”式教学,注重学生对观点的提取、呈现、辩论等能力的培养。“话题评价”占这门课程40%的权重,
In order to ensure the scientific, normative, less arbitrary and subjective nature of procedural evaluation, the 11st Institute stressed that the description of evaluation indicators should be specific, actionable and quantifiable. Evaluation to take a combination of qualitative and quantitative, both the evaluation of scores, but also a description of the language of evaluation. Taking Ideology and Politics I as an example (see Table 9), this course is a type I course in the humanities field in the eleven school curriculum system. It is suitable for student study in engineering economics and mathematics and physics and meets the graduation requirements. Due to getting rid of a large number of knowledge points required for college entrance examination and memory, Class Ⅰ has a larger room for development, the implementation of “topic ” teaching, pay attention to students’ ability to extract, present, debate and other capabilities. “Topic evaluation ” account for 40% of the weight of this course,