论文部分内容阅读
理论界关于律师伪证罪为行为犯还是结果犯的争论,对于从理论上深入探讨律师伪证罪和保障司法实践中正确处理本罪与此罪的审理秩序等程序正当性问题,均具有重要意义。然而,无论是行为犯还是结果犯都存在或是实践中,或是理论中的问题而无法解决。鉴于律师伪证罪行为的特殊性和现实司法实践现状认为,应当赋予法官一定自由裁量权,对律师伪证罪行为从多方面因素共同考虑律师伪证行为的社会危害性,从而确定对其行为的追究与否。
Theoretical debate on whether perjury or perjury is a crime of perpetration or result is of great significance both for theoretical discussion of perjury in perjury and for guaranteeing the proper handling of this crime and trial of this crime in judicial practice. However, it is impossible to solve the problem both in practice and in practice, or in theory. In view of the particularity of the lawyer’s perjury and the actuality of the judicial practice, we should give the judges some discretion and consider the harmfulness of lawyers’ perjury behavior from many aspects to the lawyer’s perjury crime, no.