论文部分内容阅读
日本学者新城新藏穷尽式排比分析了《左传》等古籍中的岁星纪事材料,在发现岁星纪事实测位和记载位不相吻合的“岁星纪事之谜”之后,大胆假设,作出五级逻辑推理,得出《左传》等岁星纪事记载位系由未识岁星超辰之战国时人以前365年为标准的元始甲寅年推步嵌入,《左传》恐成书于前340至350年前后的结论。洪诚曾撰文揭示出新城的重大错误,可惜未能引起学界足够的重视。本文在洪先生论证的基础上,进一步梳理新城错误产生的逻辑机理,对新城岁星周期误差的论证起点和三项逻辑预设均进行了驳斥;并对由岁星纪事推证《左传》等著作年代,乃至由天文星象论证古籍成书年代方法之可信度作出了初步评估。
The Japanese scholar Neo-Shinsaibashi has exhaustively exhaustively paralleled the analysis of the Chronicle materials in the ancient books such as Zuo Chuan. After discovering the mystery of the Superstar Chronicle that does not coincide with the factual record of the age-old star, Five levels of logical reasoning, come to “Zuo Zhuan” and other age-star event records bit by the unknown star Chao-chen of the Warring States period 365 years before the standard as the beginning of the first Jiayin years embedding, “Zuo Zhuan” fear into the book 340 to 350 years before and after the conclusion. Hong Cheng has published an article that reveals the Metro Metro major mistake, but unfortunately failed to attract enough attention academia. On the basis of Mr. Hong ’s argument, this paper further sorts out the logical mechanism of the new city mistakes, refutes the starting point and the three logical presuppositions of the new city’ s life cycle error, and analyzes “Zuo Zhuan” Waiting for the book, and even astronomical astrology demonstrated the credibility of the method of dating the book made a preliminary assessment.