论文部分内容阅读
目的:构建儿童专科医院专职科研人员绩效评价体系，调动专职科研人员的积极性，提高科研产出效率，以科研水平的提升带动医院整体水平的提高。方法:以结构-过程-结果模型为理论依据，结合文献查阅和人才绩效评价管理工作经验初步确定指标库。2020年11月至2021年3月，采用德尔菲法确定最终的评价指标和权重，通过头脑风暴法对指标进行可量化标准制定，形成儿童专科医院专职科研人员绩效评估模型。选取某研究型儿童专科医院的5名专职科研人员为评估对象，分别采用新构建的模型和该院原有绩效评价方案进行实证研究。结果:组织15位专家开展2轮德尔菲法专家咨询，最终构建包括3项一级指标、8项二级指标与23项三级指标的儿童专科医院专职科研人员绩效评价模型。其中，一级指标科研产出、科研过程和科研投入权重分别为0.507、0.267和0.226。实证研究结果显示，本研究构建绩效评价模型的考核结果更符合实际情况，更有助于研究团队发现不足。结论:本研究构建的绩效评价模型可对科研人员起到正向引导与激励作用，推动临床与基础的交叉融合以及促进医院的学科建设和科研人才培养。“,”Objective:To build a performance appraisal system for full-time researchers in specialized children′s hospitals, so as to mobilize their enthusiasm and improve their efficiency of scientific and technological output.Methods:Based on structure-process-result model, the library of indexes was initialized by such means as literature review and talent performance appraisal management experiences. From November 2020 to March 2021, Delphi method was adopted to finalize the appraisal indexes and weight of each index, while the quantifiable standards of the indexes were formulated by brainstorming, hence establishing the performance appraisal model index system for these researchers. Using both the new model and the original performance appraisal system of the hospital respectively, five full-time research staffs of research-oriented children′s hospital were selected for an empirical research on performance appraisal.Results:Fifteen experts carried out two rounds of Delphi research, finalizing a performance appraisal model for these researchers. The model comprises 3 level-1 indexes, 8 level-2 indexes and 23 level-3 indexes. Among them, the weight of scientific research output, scientific research process and scientific research investment of level-1 indexes were 0.507, 0.267 and 0.226, respectively. Empirical research showed that compared with the original appraisal indexes, the results of the new performance appraisal model were more targeted, enabling the research team to identify setbacks.Conclusions:The indexes set in the model built in this study prove more scientific, objective, and more reasonable in weight assignment. Such indexes can positively motivate and encourage the researchers, promoting the clinical-basic research integration, as well as the disciplinary development and research talent cultivation of the hospital.