论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同气道给药方式对治疗吸痰后气管黏膜损伤出血的效果。方法选择清醒的气管切开患者20例,采用随机对照研究方法分为观察组和对照组各10例。所有患者均采用盐酸肾上腺素经气道给药,其中观察组用超声雾化吸入的方法给药,对照组采用气管内滴入的方法。比较两组的止血效果,呛咳的发生率、患者的舒适程度。观察止血过程中不良反应的发生情况。结果观察组的止血效果明显好于对照组,观察组与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),与对照组相比观察组有呛咳发生率低,不良反应少,患者亦无不适主诉。结论雾化吸入给药方式的疗效优于气管内滴入的给药方式。
Objective To investigate the effect of different airway administration on tracheal mucosal injury after aspiration for sputum aspiration. Methods Twenty patients with conscious tracheotomy were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group with 10 cases in each group. All patients were treated with epinephrine hydrochloride via airway, in which the observation group was administered by ultrasonic inhalation and the control group by intratracheal instillation. Compare the two groups of hemostatic effect, the incidence of cough, the patient’s comfort level. Observe the occurrence of adverse reactions in the process of hemostasis. Results The hemostatic effect of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group. The difference between the observation group and the control group was statistically significant (P <0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group had low incidence of cough, less adverse reactions and no patients Discomfort complained. Conclusion The efficacy of nebulized inhalation is better than that of intratracheal instillation.