论文部分内容阅读
实质推理是相对于形式推理的一种法律推理方法,是当法律或事实前提出现漏洞,或存在争议的时候,通过法官使用价值判断、社会公平正义进行案件的判决。赋予了法官一定的自由裁量权。本文以泸州遗赠案为切入点,介绍了实质推理在法律适用中的具体运用,阐述了实质推理在疑难案件中的适用原则,分析了实质推理的核心要素,即社会利益的衡量。
Substantial reasoning is a kind of legal reasoning method relative to formal reasoning. When a loophole exists in the premise of law or fact or there is controversy, judgments on the case are made by judges using the value judgments and social fairness and justice. Give the judge a certain degree of discretion. Based on the case of Luzhou bereavement case, this article introduces the concrete application of substantive reasoning in the application of law, expounds the applicable principle of substantive reasoning in difficult cases, and analyzes the core element of substantive reasoning, that is, the measurement of social benefits.