论文部分内容阅读
这里我向广大读者推荐一篇由英国议会工党顾问约翰·罗斯所写的文章.题目为《俄罗斯经济的两大特点和经济改革》,文章中约翰·罗斯比较了俄罗斯向市场经济过渡的两个方案——“休克疗法”和中国改革方法,并由此得出结论:第一种方法对俄罗斯是有害的,第二种方法对俄罗斯是有益的.他令人信服地指出国际货币基金组织所推荐的“休克疗法”要让俄罗斯丢弃工业化;并将俄罗斯转变成生产日用消费品和原料的基地.然而,中国的改革方法能帮助俄罗斯更好地发展消费品生产,而且能不断地提高国内人民生活水平.约翰·罗斯的文章第一次发表在专业性很强发行量较小的杂志《经济学和数学法》(1993年第2期第29卷).实际上这篇文章在广泛的读者中引起强烈的反响.一个没有偏见的专业研究员客观地分析了俄罗斯经济崩溃的原因,说明俄罗斯经济崩溃是人类历史上前所
Here I would like to recommend to our readers an essay by John Roth, Labor Party Adviser to the British Parliament, entitled “Two Major Features of the Russian Economy and Economic Reform,” in which John Rose compares two Russian transitions to a market economy Program - “shock therapy” and China’s reform methods, and concluded that the first method is harmful to Russia and the second method is good for Russia, he convincingly pointed out that the International Monetary Fund The proposed “shock therapy” will allow Russia to abandon its industrialization and turn Russia into a base for producing consumer goods and raw materials.However, China’s reform methods can help Russia better develop its consumer products and continuously improve its people’s livelihood Level. “The article by John Ross was first published in the less-specialized magazine” Economics and Mathematics "(Volume 29, 1993). In fact, this article is widely read by readers Aroused strong repercussions.A unbiased professional researcher objectively analyzed the reasons for the Russian economic collapse, indicating that the collapse of the Russian economy is a human calendar Approached the