目次一、引论:问题、论域与方法二、罗马法如何界定错误之“重大”三、后世大陆法传统如何界定错误之“重大”四、如何解释我国民法中的“重大”误解五、结论一、引论:问题、论域与方法(一)问题《民法通则》第59条规定,行为人对行为内容有重大误解的,一方有权请求人民法院或者仲裁机关予以变更或者撤销。《合同法》第54条也规定,因重大误解订立的合同,当事人一方有权请求人民法院或者仲裁机构变更或者撤销。就“误解”一词应统一表述为西方法律传统中共同认可的作为普适术语 Second, the Roman law how to define the wrong “major ” Third, how to define the wrong tradition of the later continental law “major ” four, how to interpret the Major “misunderstanding V. Conclusions I. Introduction: Problems, Fields and Methods (I) Problems Article 59 of the General Principles of Civil Law stipulates that if a perpetrator misunderstood the content of the act, one party has the right to request the people’s court or the arbitration organ Be changed or withdrawn. Article 54 of the Contract Law also stipulates that due to a major misunderstanding, a party has the right to request the people’s court or arbitration institution to change or cancel the contract. The word ”misunderstanding" should be uniformly formulated as common terminology recognized in Western legal traditions