论文部分内容阅读
近年来,环境法在我国日趋独立,成为我国社会主义法律体系建设中的重要一环及组成部分,法律规范形式日趋多样、自成体系。而有关环境法学的学术研究也日趋繁荣、丰富与多元。随着环境危机在中国当下的日趋凸显以及环境公共安全事件或群体性事件的频发,环境法的法律适用也频繁步入司法的视野,受到国人与社会的高度关注。我刊曾于2010年第4期组织笔谈,邀请徐祥民、刘卫先、刘超、陈海嵩四位学者就我国环境法学研究方法论问题进行撰文,表明了本刊对于环境法学理论研究的持续关注。六年来,我国环境法学研究的表面繁荣依然如故,但有关环境法学的研究进路、立场、视野、方法及分析工具等有关环境法学研究及环境法制实践的方法论却并未得到同步或先进的发展。而方法论对于环境法学研究及环境法制实践所具有的导向、指引及规范等重要意义自不待言,这些都需要环境法学研究共同体的学术积淀及理论贡献。因此,为了推动环境法学界对于环境法学方法论的理论自觉与学术贡献,本刊特别邀请秦天宝、巩固、刘卫先、陈冬四位学者分享其有关环境法学方法论的心得及体会,希望为我国环境法学研究持续助力。
In recent years, environmental law has become increasingly independent in our country and has become an important part and part of the construction of China’s socialist legal system. The forms of legal norms are becoming increasingly diverse and self-contained. Academic research on environmental law is also increasingly prosperous, rich and diverse. With the increasing crisis in China and the frequent occurrence of environmental public safety incidents or mass incidents, the legal application of environmental law has also frequently stepped into the judicial field of vision and has drawn great attention from the people and the society. In my fourth issue in 2010, my journal organized an interview and invited four authors, Xu Xiangmin, Liu Weixian, Liu Chao and Chen Haisong, to write an essay on the methodology of China’s environmental law research, which shows our continuous concern about the theoretical study of environmental law. In the past six years, the surface prosperity of environmental law studies in China remains unchanged. However, the research methods, analytical methods, environmental analysis tools and other research methods related to environmental law have not been synchronized or advanced in their development. . The importance of methodology in guiding, researching, and standardizing environmental law research and environmental legal practice goes without saying, all of which require the academic accumulation and theoretical contribution of the environmental law research community. Therefore, in order to promote environmental law scholars’ theoretical consciousness and academic contribution to environmental law methodology, we invite Qin Tianbao, Consolidate, Liu Weixian, and Chen Dong to share their experiences and experiences in environmental law methodology. Research continues to help.