论文部分内容阅读
1996年12月25日,扬州市中级人民法院作出判决:驳回扬州市环保局、消防支队、劳动局、规划局对“醉仙居锅炉案”的上诉,维持广陵区人民法院的原审判决。即:撤销批准“醉仙居”建锅炉房的具体行政行为,该判决为终审判决。一年前,与扬州醉仙居酒家相邻的49位老百姓,因自己正当权益受到侵害,状告4个政府执法单位,从此拉开扬州历史上首例“民告官”的集团行政诉讼案。该案历经坎坷,终于胜诉,在这古城扬州再掀波澜。 一 说起“醉仙居酒家”,扬州人无人不晓。它是设在城西交通要道文化路边的一家私营餐饮企业。许是经
On December 25, 1996, the Intermediate People’s Court of Yangzhou City handed down the verdict: dismissing the appeal from Yangzhou Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau, Fire Brigade, Labor Bureau and Planning Bureau on the “Drunk Xianju Boiler Case” and upholding the judgment of first instance of Guangling District People’s Court. Namely: the revocation of the approval of “Drunk Xianju” built boiler room specific administrative act, the verdict is the final judgment. A year ago, 49 people adjacent to the Yangzhou Drunk Sinju Restaurant sued four government law enforcement units for suing for their legitimate rights and interests. From then on, they opened the first case of administrative litigation in the history of Yangzhou . The case had been bumpy and finally won a victory in this ancient city of Yangzhou waves. Speaking of “drunk Xianju Ju restaurant,” Yangzhou everyone unknown. It is located in the western city of traffic arteries of a private catering company. Xu is by