论文部分内容阅读
汉宋之争贯穿了桐城派前后,迫使桐城派将考据作为理论与实践武器,运用于学术研究和古文理论与创作中。桐城派前期,汉宋之争白热化,宋学处于下风,姚鼐治学引入了考证,但主要沿袭了传统考据治学之路,排斥汉学家的小学训诂,拒绝吸收汉学家的成果,学术成就不大;桐城派中后期,汉宋关系缓和,曾国藩在坚持宋学的基础上,打破了汉宋壁垒,全面倡导学习汉学家的小学训诂,吸收汉学家的成果,真正实现了汉宋兼采,取得了较大的学术成就。桐城派考据思想的前后变化亦鲜明地表现在他们的古文理论中,影响了古文创作的走向,使桐城派古文走出了一条兴盛-衰落-中兴之路。
The dispute between Han and Song Dynasties broke through before and after the Tongcheng School, forcing the Tongcheng School to apply the test as a weapon of theory and practice and apply it to academic research and the theory and creation of ancient prose. In the early period of Tongcheng School, the war between Han and Song Dynasties intensified. The study of Song dynasty was at a disadvantage. The study of Yao Zhi introduced research. However, it mainly followed the path of traditional textual research, excluded the primary school doctrine of sinologists, and refused to absorb the achievements of sinologists. On the basis of adhering to the Song Studies, Zeng Guofan broke the Barriers between Han and Song Dynasties and comprehensively advocated the learning of Sinology Primary School, absorbed the achievements of Sinologists, and achieved the goal of both Han and Song Dynasties A greater academic achievement. Tongcheng school test based on ideological changes before and after is also clearly manifested in their ancient theory, affecting the trend of ancient writing, so that Tongcheng School of ancient writing out of a flourishing - decline - ZTE road.