论文部分内容阅读
自20世纪90年代以降直到2009年6月18日的第69号法令,意大利民事第一审程序的重大改革一直在进行,然而,意大利民事诉讼的变革缺乏一个综合性的改良计划,尤其是在对抗性模式与非对抗性模式之间没有作出明晰的选择。1990年的改革,加强了法官的作用,而在公司诉讼特别程序(rito societario)中基本上是由双方当事人之间进行案件早期的操作;竞争法(legge competitività)给予双方当事人选择特别程序(rito societario)的可能性。然而,这些改革都强调了法官的角色作用,在诉讼管理和证据的出示中保持了程序的刚性。为了确保系统的正常运行,法院必须有一个行之有效的制裁制度和一个支持性的干预制度,以平衡法官的工作量,鼓励法官的专业化,监控达成效率和工作指标的程度。
However, there has been a lack of a comprehensive improvement plan for the reform of civil litigation in Italy, especially since the drastic reform of the first instance civil procedure in Italy has taken place since Decree No. 69 which dropped from the 1990s until June 18, There is no clear choice between adversarial and non-adversarial modes. The reforms of 1990 strengthened the role of judges, whereas in the rito societario the case was basically handled early by the parties; the law of competition (legge competitività) gave both parties the option of special procedures (rito societario). However, all of these reforms emphasize the role of judges and maintain the procedural rigidity in the management of litigation and the presentation of evidence. In order to ensure the proper operation of the system, the court must have an effective system of sanctions and a supportive system of intervention to balance the workload of judges, encourage the specialization of judges and monitor the degree to which efficiency and job indicators are achieved.