论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨乳腺钼靶X线诊断非钙化型乳腺癌的临床价值。方法:抽取2015年5月至2017年6月河南省直第三人民医院收治的96例非钙化型乳腺癌患者，所有患者分别行超声检查和乳腺钼靶X线检查。以病理诊断结果为金标准，比较两种检查方式的诊断符合率。结果:乳腺钼靶X线检查的诊断符合率(94.79%，91/96)高于超声检查(75.00%，72/96)，n P0.05)。乳腺钼靶X线检测出肿瘤长径>2 cm者50例(52.08%)，肿瘤长径≤2 cm者46例(47.92%)；超声检查检测出肿瘤长径>2 cm者53例(55.21%)，肿瘤长径≤2 cm者43例(44.79%)；两者比较差异未见统计学意义(χn 2＝0.189，n P>0.05)。n 结论:在非钙化型乳腺癌诊断中，乳腺钼靶X线检查符合率高与超声检查，诊断临床价值高。“,”Objective:To investigate the clinical value of mammography in the diagnosis of non-calcified breast cancer.Methods:A total of 96 patients with non-calcified breast cancer admitted to Henan Provincial Third People’s Hospital from May 2015 to June 2017 were enrolled in the study. All of them underwent ultrasound and mammography examination. Taking pathological results as the golden standard, the diagnostic coincidence rates of the two examination methods were compared.Results:The diagnostic coincidence rate of mammography was 94.79%(91/96), higher than 75.00%(72/96) of ultrasound examination (n P0.05). Mammography detected 50 cases (52.08%) with tumor major diameter >2 cm, and 46 cases (47.92%) with tumor major diameter ≤2 cm; ultrasound examination detected 53 cases (55.21%) with tumor major diameter >2 cm, and 43 cases (44.79%) with tumor major diameter ≤2 cm. There was no significant difference in tumor major diameter results of the two examination methods (χn 2=0.189, n P>0.05).n Conclusions:Compared with ultrasound examination, mammography has a higher coincidence rate and significant value in the diagnosis of non-calcified breast cancer.