论文部分内容阅读
目前,死刑案件审判阶段证明标准这一课题,学界存在“多元论”与“一元论”的观点分歧。“多元论”试图以区分死刑案件与非死刑案件的审判证明标准达到限制、正确适用死刑的目的,研究颇多的是分层论、分类构建论等“多元论”观点,这种思路存在诸多弊端。从区分审判阶段证明标准以期达到正确适用死刑,限制死刑适用的目标,文章从逻辑、价值角度分析证明此路不通。
At present, the standard of proof in the trial stage of the death penalty case is subject to the divergence of views between the “pluralism” and the “monism” in the academic circle. “Pluralism ” attempts to distinguish between the death penalty case and non-death penalty trial to achieve the standard proof of the trial, the correct application of the death penalty purposes, research is a lot of stratification, classification theory of construction “pluralism ” point of view, this idea There are many drawbacks. From distinguishing the proof standards in the trial stage in order to achieve the correct application of the death penalty and limiting the application of the death penalty, the article proves that the road is not feasible through logic and value analysis.