论文部分内容阅读
环西太平洋地区各国新兴的优惠性贸易协定为贸易自由化的政治经济学分析带来了明显的启示。双边和多边协定使相关的实力因素成为贸易条约谈判中的一个关键特征。同时由于关贸总协定条款第24条对“绝大多数贸易(substantiallyallthetrade)”的特征缺乏界定,各国也没能对此达成一致,这使各国通过优惠性贸易协定方式彼此之间提供一种有选择的自由化。通过分析,作者认为,亚太地区向双边主义方向发展是以牺牲跨地区性的亚太经合组织为代价的。同时由于东盟国家没有能够有效应对1997～1998年的金融危机而受到过广泛的批评,所以中国决定与东盟订立一种框架性协定则增强了东南亚国家的实力。
The emerging preferential trade agreements among the countries in the western Pacific have brought significant implications for the political economy analysis of trade liberalization. Bilateral and multilateral agreements have made the relevant strength factors a key feature of trade treaty negotiations. At the same time, because GATT clause 24 lacks the definition of “the vast majority of trade,” and no country can reach an agreement on this, countries are providing each other with a preferential trade agreement Liberalization of choice. Through the analysis, the author believes that the development of the Asia-Pacific region toward bilateralism is at the expense of cross-regional APEC. At the same time, ASEAN countries have not been widely criticized for failing to effectively deal with the financial crisis of 1997-1998. Therefore, China’s decision to establish a framework agreement with ASEAN has strengthened the strength of the Southeast Asian countries.