论文部分内容阅读
观测资料表明，井水位对信息响应存在“记忆”滞后现象，它与一般的位相滞后不同。在鲁29并现场试验也证明了井水位对井口空气压力变化的响应存在“记忆”滞后现象。利用水平层状承压含水层模式，从理论上解释了井水位对井口空气压力变化响应的“记忆”滞后现象，认为这种现象与水井含水层的导水系数有关，含水层导水系数越小，这种现象越明显。用一般多元回归方法无法较好地扣除井水位中“记忆”滞后影响，作者给出了一种可以扣除这种影响的新方法。利用此方法处理了鲁03并观测资料，求出该井水位固体潮系数为1．8mm／10-8，水位对固体潮滞后时间1．53h；气压系数6．4mm／hPa，滞后时间1．50h。用新方法改正后的水位中误差明显减小，改正效果较好。
Observational data indicate that there is a “memory” lag in response to well water level, which is different from the general phase lag. In Lu 29 and on-site tests also demonstrated that there was a “memory” lag in the response of well water levels to changes in the wellhead air pressure. Using the horizontal stratiform confined aquifer model, the “memory” hysteresis of the response of well water level to wellhead air pressure is explained theoretically. This phenomenon is related to the conductivity coefficient of aquifer aquifer, Small, the more obvious this phenomenon. Using the general multiple regression method can not deduct the “memory” hysteresis well in the well water level well, the author gives a new method to deduce this kind of influence. Using this method, Lu 03 was processed and the observed data were obtained. The solid tide coefficient of the well was 1.8mm / 10-8 and the water tide lasted 1.53h; the pressure coefficient was 6.4mm / hPa and the lag time was 1. 50h. With the new method to correct the water level error was significantly reduced, the correction is better.