凌俊峰的这篇文章,看到题目后让我眼前一亮,这个问题其实反映的是儒家“守经”与“权变”的理论问题。五代时期的冯道,一生历事五朝,侍奉了十位皇帝,始终居于高位,处于权力的核心位置。当时有人称赞他是士人领袖,称赞他不拘一格选拔人才、在乱世中保护百姓,死后却又被许多正统史学家斥为不知廉耻、毫无原则的奸佞,是不顾名节贪恋权贵的小人,两种说法可谓天水违行,冰火难容。我们应该怎样看待冯道的为人处世 Ling Junfeng’s article, after seeing the title let me shine, this question actually reflects the Confucian “Shou Jing” and “contingency” theory. During the Five Dynasties period, Feng Daoguang lived in the Five Dynasties for a lifetime and served ten emperors, always in the highest position and at the core of power. At that time, some people praised him as a leader of a scholarship. He praised him for choosing talents with ecstasy and protecting people in times of troubled life. However, many orthodox historians dismissed him as a shameless and unprincipled adulterous person after his death, Villain, two kinds of claims can be said Tianshui violations, hard to beat. How should we treat Feng Daowei man