论文部分内容阅读
为现代天文学奠定重要基础的开普勒(Johannes Kepler,1571—1630),以行星运动三定律的发现著称。对于他的坚强意志,在逆境中顽强拼搏的精神,坚持信仰的勇气,追求真理的胆略,马克思曾给予高度赞赏,你为最敬仰的英雄之一。然而,在自然科学史上,由于他的科学思想和科研方法的缘故,遭到种种曲解和非议,尤其是导致他成功的思辨性的科研方法,一直不为世人所接受,被指责为“荒谬怪诞”、“自相矛盾”等。这位伟人被蒙上了神秘的迷雾。本文试图历史的观点考察与分析开普勒的科学思想与科研方法,并立足于现代自然科学,重新审视、评价开普勒,以期为丰富与发展现代自然科学研究方法论提供借鉴。
Johannes Kepler (1571-1630), which laid an important foundation for modern astronomy, is famous for the discovery of the three laws of planetary motion. For his strong will, adversity in the spirit of tenacious struggle, adhere to the courage of faith, the courage to pursue the truth, Marx has given highly appreciated, you are one of the most admired hero. However, in the history of natural science, due to his scientific thinking and scientific research methods, he has been subjected to misunderstandings and criticisms, especially the speculative scientific research methods that led to his success. They have never been accepted by the world and are accused of “absurd grotesque ”,“ Self-contradictory ”and so on. This great man was cast in a mysterious fog. This paper attempts to study and analyze Kepler’s scientific thinking and research methods from the perspective of history. Based on modern natural sciences, Kepler reexamined and evaluated Kepler in order to provide reference for enriching and developing modern natural science research methodology.