黎汝清同志的近作《湘江之战——中共历史上的一大悲剧》,是一部历史题材的长篇纪实文学。作者在代后记中宣称此作“就历史真实来说,百分之九十五是真的,可以当作准历史来读”。然而,我们读过之后,感到作品中所反映的重大历史事件严重失实。在此,仅就几个问题与作者商榷。一、关于湘江之战作者在代后记中说:“很多史料(我不敢说所有史料)都指责王明‘左’倾路线执行者撤离中央苏区是大搬家、抬轿子,所以遭致湘江一战红军损失过半的惨败。这些史料只给你一种 Comrade Li Ruqing’s recent work, “Battle of the Xiangjiang River - A Major Tragedy in the History of the Chinese Communist Party,” is a lengthy documentary documentary of historical themes. In the memoirs, the author claims that “in the historical truth, 95% is true and can be read as a quasi-history.” However, after reading it, we feel that the major historical events reflected in the works have been seriously misrepresented. Here, only a few questions with the author. First, the author of the Xiangjiang River war on behalf of generations said: "a lot of historical data (I can not say that all the historical data) are accused of Wang Ming ’left’ line performer withdraw from the Central Soviet Area is a large move, sedan chair, it was Xiangjiang River battle The Red Army lost more than half of the defeat. These historical facts give you only one