读2002年《书屋》第九期上黄忠晶先生的文章《并非为萨特和波伏瓦辩护》,我可以相信黄先生对于历史人物的评说还是有极为可靠的资料依据的。特别是相对于他认为,董鼎山先生撇开阅读史料(比如书信自传、手稿、传记材料之类),而一味把道德、人格不佳的种种帽子扣给萨特和波伏瓦是不妥的,我首先要声明一个 Reading Huang Zhongyong’s essay in the ninth issue of “The Bookstore,” in 2002, “is not a defense of Sartre and Beauvoir.” I can believe that Mr. Huang’s critique of historical figures is still based on extremely reliable sources. In particular, relative to his opinion, it is improper for Dong Dongshan to put aside the reading of historical materials (such as autobiographical correspondence, manuscripts, biographical materials, etc.) and to blindly sacrifice morality and personality to Sartre and Beauvoir First to declare one