贫血鉴别诊断中血液检验红细胞参数的检验价值分析

来源 :中国医药指南 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:xiaojiaoechou
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的 探究检验血液当中红细胞参数对贫血鉴别诊断的价值?方法 对2018年1月至2019年8月来我院进行治疗的90例贫血患者作为观察组,另选90名健康体检者作为对照组,对所有研究对象利用血红细胞分析仪开展血液红细胞检查,分析红细胞在各参数方面的差异?结果 ①观察组缺铁性贫血患者的血HGB?RBC?MCV?MCH参数比对照组偏低,RDW比对照组偏高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)?②观察组的溶血性贫血?巨幼细胞贫血患者的HGB?RBC低于对照组,MCV?RDW?MCH比对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.0“,”Objective To investigate the value of red blood cell parameters in the diagnosis of anemia. Methods Ninety patients with anemia who came to our hospital for treatment from January 2018 to August 2019 were regarded as the observation group, and another 90 healthy subjects were selected as the control group. All the subjects were examined by a red blood cell analyzer. Analyze the differences in parameters of red blood cells. Results (1) The blood HGB, RBC, MCV, MCH and other parameters of the iron-deficiency anemia patients in the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the RDW was higher than that of the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). (2) The HGB and RBC of patients with hemolytic anemia and megaloblastic anemia in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and MCV, RDW, and MCH were higher than those in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). (3) Aplastic disorders in the observation group the HGB, RBC and RDW, MCH was higher the control group of patients with anemia, liver and kidney disease and blood loss were lower than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Anemia patients with different types of anemia have their own differences in red blood cell parameters. Summarizing the differences in red blood cell parameters can effectively analyze the types of anemia in patients. It is of great significance to clinical diagnosis and treatment and is worth recommending.
其他文献
目的 研究分析瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚应用与剖宫产全身麻醉的安全性及其对胎儿的影响?方法 随机选取2016年6月至2019年6月在我院行全身麻醉剖宫产的27例产妇为观察组,再随机选取同期在院行腰硬联合麻醉剖宫产的27例产妇为对照组?记录比较两组产妇麻醉前?麻醉后10min及麻醉后30min的心率和血压情况,记录比较新生儿娩出1min?娩出10min及娩出30min时Apgar评分情况,记录比较孕妇手术情况及脐动脉白气情况?结果 两组产妇麻醉前心率?血压及麻醉10min?麻醉30min后两组产妇心率?舒张压差异无
目的 评价在糖尿病早期肾损伤中尿常规、尿微量蛋白检测的诊断价值,通过有价值的诊断数据为糖尿病早期肾损伤患者临床治疗工作提供有价值的参考,进而促进患者预后。方法 选择我院2018年1月至2019年1月期间收治治疗的糖尿病患者,取80例,作为试验组(试验组糖尿病患者根据尿蛋白定性程度分1、2、3、4、5 组)。同时,选择同期进行体检的健康人群80名,作为对照组。此次研究参与者知情同意,伦理委员会审核批准。两组受试者均同时检测尿常规、尿微量蛋白,比较两组检测结果,包括尿常规阳性率、尿微量蛋白阳性率,分析糖尿病患