论文部分内容阅读
前不久,长沙市中级人民法院一审判决上海安道体育用品有限公司和第三人上海安道鞋业发展有限公司停止侵犯阿迪达斯萨洛蒙有限公司“阿迪达斯”、“ADIDAS”和“adidas”注册商标专用权的行为。记者在长沙市中级人民法院对本案的裁决书上注意到这样的表述:被告安道体育用品公司和第三人安道鞋业公司未经许可,在其经营活动中突出使用以原告“阿迪达斯”驰名商标为字号的企业名称,并授意他人使用原告商标,侵犯了原告的商标专用权。同时,上述两公司还在其商品等经营活动中使用了以原告“阿迪达斯”驰名商标为字号的企业名称,构成对原告的不正当竞争。
Not long ago, the Changsha Intermediate People’s Court of First Instance ruled that Shanghai Andao Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. and third party Shanghai Andao Footwear Development Co., Ltd. stop infringing the exclusive rights to register trademarks of Adidas, ADIDAS and adidas of Adidas Salomon Co., Ltd. the behavior of. Reporters in Changsha City Intermediate People’s Court on the verdict on the case noted that the statement: the defendants Ando Sporting Goods Company and third-party Ando Footwear Company without permission, in its business activities to highlight the use of the plaintiff “Adidas” well-known trademarks For the name of the company name, and to instruct others to use the plaintiff’s trademark, infringes the plaintiff’s trademark rights. In the meantime, the above two companies also used the name of the enterprise whose name was the well-known trademark of the plaintiff “Adidas” in the operation of its commodities, which constituted unfair competition against the plaintiff.