在教学中,有时会发现:同一堂课,不同的教师去上,效果可能大不相同。究其原因,当然是多方面的,但关键之一,往往是在教学方法上,能否启发引导学生进行积极地思维。如果教师善于抓住教材中的启发因素,激发学生的学习兴趣,使学生学得主动、活泼、扎实,从而掌握了教师传授的知识。这种教学方法就是启发式。 一提到启发式,有的人只理解为问答式。如果课堂上未出现问答,就被认为是注入式。这种理解是片面的。诚然,问答是启发式的一种好形式(只说是形式),但重要的,不是看形式,而要看内容。同样的问答式,可以是很好的启发式,也可以是变相的注入式。只要你 In teaching, you will sometimes find that the effect of different teachers may not be the same in the same class. The reason, of course, is multifaceted, but one of the key, often in the teaching methods, can inspire and guide students to actively think. If teachers are good at grasping the inspiration factors in the textbooks to stimulate students’ interest in learning so that students learn proactive, lively and solid, thus mastered the knowledge imparted by teachers. This teaching method is heuristic. When it comes to heuristic, some people only understand it as a question and answer. If there is no question and answer in the class, it is considered to be infused. This understanding is one-sided. True, question and answer are a good form of heuristics (just say form), but the important thing is not the form, but the content. The same question and answer, can be a good heuristic, can also be disguised injection. only you