论文部分内容阅读
我国城乡社区研究存在一定程度的跛足现象,“短”的便是城市社区研究。究其原因,一是源于不入流的写家将国家控制作为自己社会分析的基点,颇似隆中对策;二是源于入流的社会理论自觉不自觉地将社会发育寄望于社区“类传统”共同体的出现。而在我们看来,如今中国城市社区“类传统”(或“原生”)共同体及其恢复的条件已被肢解、消解,其中重要原因是由于社会新生了个体化倾向,而个体化并不意味社会分裂为原子,个体化的个体们将取向结成自致性共同体。而这可能对应了社会的发育、公共领域的扩大以及国家与社会关系可进入按各自逻辑运行的条件。
There is a certain degree of lameness phenomenon in the study of urban and rural communities in our country, and “short” is the study of urban community. The reason is that writers from non-inflows regard state control as the starting point for their own social analysis and are somewhat like Longzhong’s countermeasures. Second, social theories stemming from inflows consciously and unconsciously pin their hopes on the community. Class tradition “community. In our opinion, the conditions for the restoration of the ”traditional“ (or ”original") community in Chinese urban communities have now been dismembered and dispelled. The important reason for this is that society is newly born with an individual tendency. Individuals It does not mean that society is split into atoms. Individualized individuals will orient themselves in a self-fulfilling community. And this may correspond to the development of the society, the expansion of the public sphere, and the conditions under which state-society relations can enter into their respective logic.