新时期以来文学研究界标举“告别功利主义、回归文学本体”的大纛对“五四”文学革命所建构的新文学观念进行了彻底的批判,并将其视为20世纪文学功利主义文学观念的罪恶之源。这样的认识在触及问题的同时,也造成了对“五四”文学观念的误解,对其复杂性、历史性挖掘不够。其实以新青年派知识群体为核心的“五四”文学先驱在文学革命发生之时有着不同的文学观念。掌握其思想共识,同时梳理他们文学观念的差异,重新审思“五四”人性启蒙中文学观的选择与建构问题,显得尤为必要。 Since the new period, the literary and art circles labeled “Farewell to Utilitarianism and Returned to Literary Ontology” a thorough critique of the new literary concept constructed by the “May Fourth” literary revolution and regarded it as the 20th century literature The Source of Sin for the Idea of ​​Utilitarianism. This kind of understanding touches the question at the same time, also caused the misunderstanding of the “May 4th” literary idea, to its complexity, the historic excavation is not enough. In fact, with the new youth to send knowledge groups as the core “May Fourth ” literary pioneer in the literary revolution has a different literary concept. It is especially necessary to grasp the ideological consensus and at the same time sort out the differences in their literary concepts and to re-examine the selection and construction of the Chinese literary concept in the May Fourth Movement.