论文部分内容阅读
《离骚》之后有《幽通》、《思玄》与《答客难》之后有《解嘲》、《答宾戏》并非一回事。俞樾之“昭明不达斯旨,妄标‘骚’体,然则《幽通赋》可谓之‘通’,《思玄赋》可谓之‘玄’乎?乃至《九歌》、《九辩》、《招魂》、《招隐》不分体例,尽被‘骚’名,古人所不料矣”说,犹大科学家走出实验室竟忘记了科学常识。而两部较为权威的《中国文学大辞典》介绍骆鸿凯《文选学》均有严重的失误。
After “Lisao”, there are “You Tong”, “Si Xuan” and “Anshan Keji” after “solution ridicule”, “A Bin play” is not the same thing. However, “You Tong Fu” can be described as “pass”, “think Xuan Fu” can be described as’ Xuan ’almost?’ And even ’Nine Songs’,’ Nine Debates’ , “Recruit”, “recruit” indiscriminately, to be ’Sao’ name, the ancients unexpectedly, “said that Judas scientists have forgotten out of the laboratory of scientific common sense. The two authoritative ”Dictionary of Chinese Literature,“ Luo Hongkai ”anthology" have serious mistakes.