论文部分内容阅读
在行政诉讼中,我国法律规定被告承担行政证明责任,当被告举证不能时应承担败诉后果。该制度旨在保障原被告双方诉讼地位之平等,但忽略了作为诉讼第三人的行政相对人之利益。如被告无正当理由不提交相关证据导致被诉具体行政行为被撤,这样直接损害与被撤销行政行为具有利害关系之行政相对人的合法权益。因此,我国亟需完善行政诉讼举证责任制度,以切实保障作为诉讼第三人的行政相对人之合法权益。
In administrative litigation, the law of our country stipulates that the defendant should bear the administrative burden of proof. When the defendant can not prove the case, the defendant should bear the consequences of losing the lawsuit. The system aims to protect the equality of the litigation status of both parties but neglects the interests of the counterpart of the third party. If the defendant does not submit the relevant evidence without justifiable reasons, the specific administrative act of the accused is withdrawn, thus directly undermining the lawful rights and interests of the administrative counterpart who is interested in the revoked administrative act. Therefore, our country urgently needs to improve the system of the burden of proof in administrative litigation in order to effectively protect the lawful rights and interests of the administrative counterpart who is the third party in litigation.