论文部分内容阅读
自动性的判断难以由中止犯的刑罚减免根据确定:但可以从其与我国刑法规定的与未遂犯的关系中确定判断标准,因为根据刑法条文表述,“自动性”与“犯罪分子意志以外”是对接的概念。自动性判断中的主观说与“自动性”的主观属性契合,在判断自动性时,要将行为人对外部事态的认识作为判断资料,然后判断该认识对行为人主观状态的影响,只要行为人主观上认为自己的行为还能继续和犯罪的目的还能实现时,实施中止行为的,就具有自动性。在自动性的判断中,一般人标准只是证明过程,而不是判断标准,其判断标准最后必须回归到行为人主观上来。
Judgment of automation is difficult to suspend the punishment of criminal penalties based on the determination: but it can be determined from the relationship with the provisions of criminal law and attempted crimes in our country, because according to the provisions of criminal law, “automatic ” and “criminals Will ”is the concept of docking. In the judgment of automation, the subjective theory of automatic judgment should be judged by the subjective attribute of “Automatism ”. Judging the external behavior of the agent as the judgment data, and then judging the influence of the cognition on the subjective state of the perpetrator, As long as the perpetrator subjectively believes that his behavior can continue and the purpose of crime can be achieved, the implementation of the suspension behavior, it has the automaticity. In the judgment of automation, most people’s standards only prove the process, not the judgment standard, and the judgment standard must finally return to the actor’s subjective view.