论文部分内容阅读
形而上学批判是形而上学之后现代思潮的中心任务，也是哈贝马斯建立交往行为理论的基本前提之一。哈贝马斯在厘定形而上学概念的基础上，为我们勾勒出一幅后形而上学情景，并试图以一种新的哲学理论对之加以超越。笔者认为，形而上学、后形而上学以及交往行为理论是不同的哲学范式，形而上学向后形而上学的演变过程是一种范式转换，两者之间存在断裂性。哈贝马斯的新的哲学范式──交往行为理论，正是在同一性和差异性之间寻求一种由沟通行为获取的新的统一性，给从形而上学中发轫而在后形而上学中又倍受质疑的现代性思想注入了新的活力。
Metaphysical criticism is the central task of modern thought after metaphysics and one of the basic preconditions for Habermas’s theory of communicative action. Based on the concept of metaphysics, Habermas outlined a post-metaphysical scenario for us and attempted to surpass it with a new philosophy. The author believes that metaphysics, post-metaphysics and communicative action theory are different philosophical paradigms. The evolution of metaphysics to metaphysics is a kind of paradigm shift, and there is a fracture between the two. Habermas’s new philosophical paradigm, the theory of communicative action, seeks to find a new unity acquired by communication between identities and differences, giving rise to both metaphysics and post-metaphysics The challenged modernity has infused new vitality.