论文部分内容阅读
有机会在《青少年书法》杂志上看到了《波颓风靡》和《书法?法?》两篇文章。文章对中国书协副主席聂成文先生的草书进行批评。从艺术发展角度看这种文艺批评无异是一件好事,是一种对艺术家从本质上的关爱,是值得称道的。同时也觉得这两位作者对聂成文先生书法的关注和剖析是比较细致的。然而,任何的批评都是具有局限性的,也可以说是一把双刃剑,在击中弊端的同时也对书家的一些优长有所忽略和伤及,这也
There is an opportunity to see two articles in the “Youth Calligraphy” magazine: “The Waves of the Wind” and “Calligraphy? The Law?”. The article criticized the cursive of Mr. Nie Chengwen, Vice Chairman of the Chinese Book Association. Judging from the perspective of artistic development, this kind of literary criticism is a good thing. It is a kind of care for the artist and it is commendable. At the same time, they also feel that the two authors’ attention and analysis of Mr. Nie Chengwen’s calligraphy are more meticulous. However, any criticism is limited. It can also be said to be a double-edged sword. While hitting the drawbacks, it also neglects and hurts some of the book’s strengths and weaknesses.