论文部分内容阅读
在当下飞速发展的中国,随着社会关系的愈加多样化、复杂化,国家行政管理的地位也越来越重要。行政管理的方式也呈现多样化,并逐渐渗入到社会生活的各个领域及层面,而相对由此产生的行政纠纷也越来越多,涉及各个方面不同的问题。因此作为公民在发生行政纠纷时对于自身合法权益的救济途径,行政救济有着无可取代的重要地位。而这其中行政复议又是十分重要的一环。而在今天的中国,对于行政复议中审查制度的方式,社会和学界一直有着不同的主张——主张书面审查为主和主张非书面审查方式为主。接下来,就让我们在了解这两种不同的行政复议审查制度的基础上,结合一定的比较法的手段,对我国现有的行政复议审查制度的发展与改进方向做出一些合理的建议。
In today’s rapidly developing China, with the ever-increasing variety and complexity of social relations, the status of state administration is becoming more and more important. The ways of administration are also diversified and gradually infiltrated into all fields and levels of social life. Administrative disputes arising therefrom are also getting more and more numerous and involve different aspects in various aspects. Therefore, as the way of relief for citizens in their legal rights and interests in the event of administrative disputes, administrative remedies have an irreplaceable important position. And the administrative reconsideration among them is a very important part. In today’s China, social and academic circles have always had different opinions on the system of censorship in administrative reconsideration - advocating written censorship and advocating non-written censorship. Next, let us make some reasonable suggestions on the development and improvement of China’s current system of administrative review on the basis of understanding these two different systems of administrative review and censorship and combining certain comparative measures.