论文部分内容阅读
目的评价中文版杜克信仰量表(DUREL)在社区一般人群中的信度。方法采用方便抽样法和KISH表法抽取宁夏地区农村居民403人。采用中文版DUREL量表对研究对象进行宗教信仰程度测评。1周后对其中的2个自然村进行复测。结果 1)量表整体Cronbachα值为0.84,汉族人群Cronbachα值为0.75,回族人群Cronbachα值为0.55;各条目Cronbachα值在0.77~0.85之间;2)量表重测信度较好,各条目ICC介于0.58~0.89之间;汉族人群的ICC介于0.37~0.87之间;回族人群的ICC介于0.43~0.77之间;3)伊斯兰教信仰者DUREL总分显著高于信仰其它宗教(佛教、道教和基督教)和无宗教信仰者(16.84±4.61 vs 8.13±2.89 vs 6.62±2.58)(P<0.001)。结论中文版DUREL量表在回、汉人群中具有良好的信度,量表评分在回、汉人群中具有显著差异。
Objective To evaluate the reliability of the Chinese version of the Duke Faith Scale (DUREL) in the general community. Methods Convenient sampling method and KISH table method were used to extract 403 rural residents in Ningxia. The Chinese version of the DUREL scale to assess the level of religious beliefs. One week later, two of the villages were retested. Results 1) The overall Cronbachα value of the scale was 0.84, the Cronbachα value of the Han population was 0.75, the Cronbachα value of the Hui population was 0.55, the Cronbachα value of each item was between 0.77 and 0.85; 2) the retest reliability of the scale was good, ICC ranged from 0.37 to 0.87 in Han population and ranged from 0.43 to 0.77 in Hui population. 3) The total score of DUREL among Islamists was significantly higher than that of other religions (Buddhism, Taoism and Christianity) and those without religion (16.84 ± 4.61 vs 8.13 ± 2.89 vs 6.62 ± 2.58) (P <0.001). Conclusion The Chinese version of the DUREL scale has good reliability in the Hui and Han populations, and the scale score has significant differences between the Hui and Han populations.