论文部分内容阅读
话语的解读涉及非确定性的假定知识,主要依赖现象学的经验结构,所涉及的非单调性质的缺省逻辑和逆证逻辑与单调性质的演绎逻辑有着本质的差异。因此本文认定,话语的解读,主要依赖逻辑规约度小于1的缺省假定知识,运用这种知识的缺省逻辑,具有可被新信息取消的特点,而取消假定知识的推理,涉及到逆证逻辑对实据信息的验证,这种验证是宏观语用推理和微观语用推理的基本要素。
The interpretation of discourse involves the assumption of non-deterministic hypothetical knowledge, which mainly relies on the empirical structure of phenomenology. The non-monotonic nature of the default logic and the inverse logic of evidence are essentially different from the monotonic deductive logic. Therefore, this paper finds that the interpretation of discourse relies mainly on the default hypothetical knowledge that the logical gauge is less than 1. By using the default logic of this knowledge, it has the characteristic of being canceled by new information, and the deduction of the hypothesized knowledge involves the reversal of evidence Logic verifies evidence information, which is the basic element of macro-pragmatic reasoning and micro-pragmatic reasoning.