论文部分内容阅读
汉语中含有非作格动词和及物动词的“V+着”存现句都仅仅表达事物的存在状态这类单一认知行为。但文章认为,这两类存现句在如何实现存在状态方面有着本质不同,而这种差异可归因于汉语语素“着”具有的两种语义属性:持续性体态义和附着性实质义。文章基于引元结构理论的分析显示,非作格动词存现句具有高位引元结构,而及物动词存现句具有低位引元结构。基于引元结构理论的分析适切地实现了两类存现句在语义蕴含、构词形态和句法推导三方面的完美匹配,因此是兑现最简理念的更优化分析。
The “V +” existential sentences that contain non-acting and transitive verbs in Chinese only express single cognitive behavior such as the existence of things. However, the article holds that these two kinds of existing sentences have different essences in terms of how to realize the existing state, and this difference can be attributed to the two semantic attributes that the Chinese morpheme ’s “has”: the essence of persistence and attachment Meaning. Based on the analysis of the structure of the elemental structure, the article shows that the non-lattice verb exists in a high-level structure while the transitive object has a low-level structure. Based on the analysis of the structure of the elemental structure, the perfect match between the two kinds of existing sentences in terms of semantic implication, word formation morphology and syntactic derivation is properly implemented, and therefore a more optimal analysis of the most simple concept is fulfilled.