1955年8期“生物学通报”刊载了“关於达尔文学说是否承认质变的问题”。作者方宗熙先生结论性的写道:“总括以上的论述,我们可以得到这样的结论:尽管达尔文对於质变、飞跃的理解不完全正确,尽管他的理论内容在某些地方有错误,尽管他的某些文字描述的不妥当、不正确,可是根据具体材料,我们无论如何也不能由此说他否认生命自然界中的质变,因而不能说他的学说是片面的、肤浅的进化理论”(该刊64页,重点是我加的——笔者)。对於方先生在该文中的许多论述,以及由此得到的这个结论,我有一些意见,今提出请大家指正。我认为对达尔文学说的评价,应该注意这样的一个原则,那就是从达尔文学说的客观存在出发,对於客观事实,不牵强附会,也不夸大缩小,经过仔细的研究分析,然后才能得到正确的结论。在达尔文的物种学说中,我认为存在着两个客观 1955 8 issue of “Bulletin” published “on Darwin’s theory whether to admit the qualitative change question.” The author, Fang Zongxi, conclusively wrote: "To sum up the above discussion, we can get the conclusion that although Darwin’s understanding of qualitative change and leap is not entirely correct, even though his theoretical content is erroneous in some places, Some words are not properly described or incorrect, but according to the specific material, we can not in any way say that he denied the qualitative changes in life and nature. Therefore, we can not say that his theory is a one-sided and superficial evolutionary theory 64 pages, the focus is I added - the author). I have some comments on many of the arguments made by Mr FANG in this article, and the conclusion I have drawn from this. Now I urge Members to correct me. In my opinion, the evaluation of Darwinism should pay attention to the principle that Darwinian theory should be based on the objective existence of objective facts, without imposing any attachment or exaggeration on the facts. After careful study and analysis, we can obtain the correct in conclusion. In Darwin’s theory of species, I think there are two objectivity