文章首先描写“怀疑”的不同义项(①不相信,②猜测、相信)在分布上接近互补又不完全互补的复杂表现。然后讨论“怀疑”的不同意义的引申机制及其概念结构基础:“怀疑”的隐性否定意义使整个句子的意义笼罩在否定的阴影之下:或者不相信事情是正面和积极的,形成义项①;或者猜测和相信事情不是正面和积极的(而是负面和消极的),形成义项②。接着,指出“怀疑”的两种意义是通过对客体论元(表示怀疑对象)在句法(体词性vs.谓词性、旁格宾语vs.常规宾语)、语义(指称性vs.陈述性)和语用(正面vs.负面、旧信息vs.新信息)等多种层次上的选择限制,在具体的语境中实现的。最后揭示听话人识解“怀疑”的各种意义所凭借的规则和策略:(1)当“怀疑”的客体论元是正面、积极或中性时,把“怀疑”识解为“不相信”(即“怀疑①”);(2)当“怀疑”的客体论元是负面、消极或偏离中性时,把“怀疑”识解为“猜测”或“相信”(即“怀疑②”)。 The article begins with a description of the different meanings of “suspicion” (① not believing, ② speculating, believing) that the distribution is close to the complex and not fully complementary complex performance. Then it discusses the extension mechanism of different meanings of “suspicion” and its conceptual structure basis: the implicit negative meaning of “suspicion” causes the meaning of the whole sentence to fall under the negative shadow: or does not believe that things are positive and positive , To form a meaning ①, or guess and believe that things are not positive and positive (but negative and negative), the formation of the meaning of ②. Then, it is pointed out that the two meanings of “doubts ” are achieved by comparing the object argument (representing suspicious objects) in the syntactic (verbal vs. verbal, paragement vs. regular), semantic (referential vs. declarative ) And pragmatic (positive vs. negative, the old information vs. new information) and other levels of selection restrictions, in a specific context to achieve. Finally, it reveals the rules and tactics that the obstruents know the various meanings of “suspicion”: (1) When the object argument of “suspicion” is positive, positive or neutral, the “suspicion” (2) When the object argument of “Doubt ” is negative, negative or deviates from neutrality, the “Doubt” solution As “guess” or “believe” (ie “suspect ② ”).