论文部分内容阅读
“鸟巢”的公私合营模式,显然不会出现在与它一路之隔的国家奥体中心当年的投资运营中。19年前亚运会举办时,中国还处在“姓社姓资”火争论的前夜 2009年7月18日,距北京奥运会一周年还有21天。下午2点,尽管伏天的午后异常闷热,旅游车、散客还是源源不断地涌入了奥林匹克公园。不少旅行团把“鸟巢”和天安门、故宫、长城等北京传统旅游景点一起列入行程,本刊记者在奥林匹克公园东门看到,
“Bird’s Nest ” public-private partnership model, apparently does not appear in the national Olympic Sports Center all the way from its investment and operation. When the Asian Games was held 19 years ago, China was still on the eve of the controversy over the name “surname and surname funding.” On July 18, 2009, there were still 21 days left before the Beijing Olympic Games. At 2 p.m., despite the unusually hot weather in the afternoon, the coaches and tourists still poured into the Olympic Park. Many tour groups included the “Bird’s Nest” and the traditional tourist attractions of Beijing, such as Tiananmen Square, Forbidden City and the Great Wall. Our correspondents saw at the east gate of the Olympic Park,