我曾看过哈密县志初稿,对民族、宗教和其它一些问题提出过修改意见。这次看到送审稿第六编,感到内容和质量都比初稿提高了。我同时还看到了木垒、轮台和阿克苏县、市志初稿,感到自治地方志书和县、市志是否专设民族志(编),体例如何安排,内容写哪一些,政策怎样掌握等方面,认识还不统一,编写方法和质量上都存在一些问题。下面结合四部志稿的情况谈谈个人看法,供同志们参考。 I have read the first draft of Hami County and have proposed amendments to the nationalities, religions and other issues. This time I saw the sixth draft of the draft for review, I feel better than the first draft of the content and quality. I also saw the wooden base, the wheel base and the Aksu County, the first draft of the city, feel the autonomy of local records and counties, the city blog is dedicated to ethnography (compilation), how to arrange the system, which content to write, how to master the policy and so on , Understanding is not uniform, writing methods and quality there are some problems. The following four manuscripts to talk about the personal opinion of the situation for comrades for reference.