中国法学研究获得进一步发展的一个可能途径是促使不同背景、不同专长的学人开展更多的实质性研究合作。目前部分法学核心期刊拒绝接受刊发联合署名的研究论文,这一发表规则在很大程度上妨碍了合作研究的有效开展。允许联署发文是高水准合作研究更多出现的前提和保障,而基于中国法学界当下的学术环境,禁止联署发文这一规则本身未必能有效起到学界期待的抑制学术不端的作用。在缺乏明显收益的情况下,学界应重新考虑、探讨相关学术制度的合理性和必要性,特别是避免禁止联署发文的规则阻碍学人打通一条有可能实现法学研究水准提升的路径。 One possible way to gain further development of Chinese law research is to promote more substantive research cooperation among scholars with different backgrounds and different specialties. At present, some journals of jurisprudence refuse to accept the publication of the joint signature of the research papers, this publication rules to a large extent impede the effective development of cooperative research. However, based on the current academic environment of China’s jurisprudence, the prohibition of joining forces to issue documents may not be able to effectively serve as an academic restraint that scholars expect to suppress. In the absence of obvious benefits, the academic community should reconsider and discuss the rationality and necessity of the relevant academic system. In particular, the rules prohibiting the prohibition of the joint issuance of documents prohibit the learners from opening up a path that may enhance the standard of legal research.