好长时间以来,关于物权法草案争议的焦点集中在是否应当对公有财产与私有财产进行平等保护。这个问题实际上是如何处理国家、集体(公有财产的持有者)与个人(私有财产的持有者)的关系。在国家、集体与个人的关系上,大致有两类观点:其一,个人是组成国家和集体的必要部分,没有个人就没有集体、国家,个人先于国家和集体; For a long time, the focus of the controversy over the draft law on property rights has focused on the equal protection of public and private property. The question is how to deal with the relationship between the state, the collective (holder of public property) and the individual (holder of private property). There are basically two types of views on the relationship between the state, the collective and the individual: First, an individual is an essential part of a nation and a collective. No individual, no individual, a state or an individual precede the state and the collective.