论文部分内容阅读
目的针对在临床中对患有子宫肌瘤的患者行以腹腔镜剔除术以及开腹手术的临床效果进行对比分析。方法 100例子宫肌瘤的患者,按照抽签的方式分成实验组以及参照组,各50例。对实验组行以剔除术,对参照组行以开腹手术,对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果在经过不同的手术治疗方法之后,实验组术中出血量高于参照组,实验组手术时长、住院时长明显优于参照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在临床中对患有子宫肌瘤的患者行以腹腔镜剔除术效果要更加理想,值得进行更加广泛的推广。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic resection and laparotomy in patients with uterine fibroids in clinical practice. Methods 100 cases of uterine fibroids patients, according to the way of lottery divided into experimental group and reference group, 50 cases each. The patients in the experimental group were treated with excision and the reference group with laparotomy. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. Results After different surgical treatment methods, the blood loss in experimental group was higher than that in reference group. The operation time and hospitalization time in experimental group were significantly better than those in reference group (P <0.05). Conclusion In patients with hysteromyoma in the clinical line of laparoscopic resection effect to be more ideal, it is worth carrying out more widely.