24年后,被打成反动学术权威的3人,必须交代是否接受了蒋的宴请,于是一同回忆起当年在茶馆和时教授家中的对话。话剧《蒋公的面子》正在全国巡演,所到之处,一票难求。剧作者温方伊正读大四。导演吕效平,也是此剧指导老师,曾将它作为舞台剧写作课的课程作业之一,收入自己主编的《青春戏剧档案》。封面上,有些矫情地附了一句“头发乱了的年代,无处安放的青春”。时任道、夏小山、卞从周,国立中央大学教授,1943年春节前夕,接到了即将出任校长的蒋介石的宴请函。去与不去,给不给“蒋该死”面子,让3位大教授头疼。24年后,被打成反动学术权威的3人,必须交代是否接受了宴请,于是一同回忆起当年在茶馆和时教授家中的对话。去还是没去,似乎真相难觅。时任道,极度反感蒋政权,但9箱留在 Twenty-four years later, the three people who were labeled as reactionary academic authorities must explain whether they accepted Chiang’s dinner and remembered the dialogue they held at the Tea House and the Shih Tzu during that year. Drama “Chiang Kai-shek’s face” is a national tour, wherever he went, a ticket is hard to find. Playwright Wen Fang Yi is reading senior. Director Lvxiao Ping, also director of the play, has used it as one of the class assignments for theatrical writing class and has his own “Youth Drama Files”. Cover, some hypocritical attached a “disheveled hair age, nowhere to place youth ”. When he assumed office, Xia Xiaoshan, Bian Congzhou, a professor at National Central University, on the eve of Spring Festival 1943, he received a dinner letter from Chiang Kai-shek, who is about to become the principal. To go with or not to give “Jiang damn ” face, so that 3 big professor of headache. Twenty-four years later, three people who were labeled as reactionary academic authorities must explain whether or not they accepted the banquet, so they recalled their dialogue with Teh-Hsiao professors at that time. Go or not, it seems hard to find the truth. When he assumed office, he was extremely displeased with Chiang Kai-shek, but nine boxes remained