写新闻、作标题,都要讲究逻辑性。目的是一个,让新闻和标题都具有无可争辩的说服力。翻阅报纸,感觉不合逻辑的标题不少,虽然有些差错不是直接来自逻辑,但造成的差错却是逻辑问题。先说一行题。一行题的结构虽然简单,但仍然有逻辑问题。例如——苏联女篮沪队迎战广西基本消灭血丝虫病人民公园夜斗持刀撬窃罪犯这三例都有逻辑错误,虽然起因不全一样:第一例显然是硬求文字对称造成的,上半句“苏联女篮”只是名词,缺乏“行为”,与下半句的“沪队迎战”没有必然联系,构不成前提与结论或前因与后果的逻辑关系。第二例的“基本”与“消灭”是自相矛盾的,“基本”是大体、大致,“消灭”是彻头彻尾,完完全全。是“基本”,就不算“消灭”,是“消灭”,就不算“基本”。第三例可能要求省字,把主语“公安人员”略去,结果是状语“人民公园”代替主语去“夜斗持刀撬窃罪犯”,但“公园”是不能与“罪犯”搏斗的。 Write news, as a title, should pay attention to logic. The goal is one, with unquestionable persuasion of both news and headlines. Reading the newspaper, I feel a lot of illogical titles, although some errors are not directly from the logic, but the error caused is a logical issue. Let me talk about a row Although the structure of a single question is simple, it still has logical problems. For example, the Soviet Union women’s basketball team against Guangxi basic elimination of filariasis People’s Park overnight fight knife pry criminals all three have a logic error, although the cause is not the same: the first case is obviously hard to find the text symmetry caused by Half of the phrase “Soviet women’s basketball” is just a noun, the lack of “behavior”, and the second half of the “Shanghai team” is not necessarily linked to the precondition and conclusion or the logical relationship between the antecedents and the consequences. The “basic” and “extermination” of the second example are self-contradictory. “Basic” is general and broad. “Elimination” is downright and complete. Is “basic”, it is not “destroy” is “destroy”, it is not “basic.” The third case may require province words, the subject of “public security officers” omitted, the result is adverb “People’s Park” instead of the subject “night bucket knife pry criminals”, but “the park” can not fight “criminals”.