论文部分内容阅读
元代文艺多以“四大家”的称谓见其水准,如元曲四大家、儒林四杰、元诗四大家,元画四大家。然而对于如何排列“四大家”又有各种说法,如明代王世贞等人曾为王实甫未被列入元曲“四大家”而提出非难,王骥德还提出过“王、马、关、郑”说,然此说未见流行。除诗文领域的四家无多变动外,绘画中的“四家”之说,也存有争议。这反映了不同时期相异的审美观念以及各自对艺术至境的追求,辨析“元画四大家”的称谓问题对研究元代的文艺成就具有重要意义。
Many literary works in the Yuan Dynasty saw the titles of “Four Masters”, such as the four masters of Yuan Qu, the four masters of Confucianism, the four masters of Yuan Poetry, and the four masters of Yuan Mo. However, there are various opinions on how to arrange the “Four Masters”. For example, Wang Shizhen and others who had not been included in the “Four Masters” of the Ming Dynasty were cynical and Wang Jide also proposed “Wang, Ma, Off, Zheng ”said, but this is not popular. In addition to the four fields in the field of poetry without change, the painting of the “four” is also controversial. This reflects the different aesthetic conceptions in different periods and their respective pursuit of the artistic boundary. It is of great significance to study the appellation issue of “The Four Masters of Yuan Dynasty Painting” to study the literary achievements of the Yuan Dynasty.