论文部分内容阅读
本刊2017年第1期刊发了长沙市雨花区检察院检察长马贤兴的署名文章《离婚“被负债”现象面面观》,随后,人民之友微信公众号转发。一石激起千尺浪,读者纷纷留言,认为文章击中了婚姻法若干问题的解释(二)第24条(债权人就婚姻关系存续期间夫妻一方以个人名义所负债务主张权利的,应当按夫妻共同债务处理。除外的情形只有两种,即夫妻实行分别财产制或与债权人明确约定为个人债务。
The first issue of 2017 issue of Changsha City Yuhua District Attorney General Ma Xianxing signed article “divorce” by the debt “phenomenon”, then, the Friends of the people WeChat public number forwarded. A stone aroused thousands of waves, the reader has a message that the article hit the marriage law a number of issues explained (b) article 24 (creditors in the marriage of the existence of a party in the name of the debts claim the right to debt, should be common to the couple There are only two exceptions to the treatment of debt, that is, the husband and wife implement separate property rights or expressly agree with the creditor as personal debt.