The Asian summer monsoon (ASM) is a vast climate system,whose variability is critical to the livelihoods of billions of people across the Asian continent.During the past half-century,much progress has been made in understanding variations on a wide range of timescales,yet several significant issues remain unresolved.Of note are two long-standing problems concerning orbital-scale variations of the ASM.(1) Chinese loess magnetic susceptibility records show a persistent glacial-interglacial dominated ～100 kyr (thousand years) periodicity,while the cave oxygen-isotope (δ18O) records reveal periodicity in an almost pure precession band (～20 kyr periodicity)—the “Chinese 100 kyr problem”.(2) ASM records from the Arabian Sea and other oceans surrounding the Asian continent show a significant lag of 8-10 kyr to Northern Hemisphere summer insolation (NHSI),whereas the Asian cave δ18O records follow NHSI without a significant lag—a discrepancy termed the “sea-land precession-phase paradox”.How can we reconcile these differences? Recent and more refined model simulations now provide spatial patterns of rainfall and wind across the precession cycle,revealing distinct regional divergences in the ASM domain,which can well explain a large portion of the disparities between the loess,marine,and cave proxy records.Overall,we also find that the loess,marine,and cave records are indeed complementary rather than incompatible,with each record preferentially describing a certain aspect of ASM dynamics.Our study provides new insight into the understanding of different hydroclimatic proxies and largely reconciles the “Chinese 100 kyr problem” and “sea-land precession-phase paradox”.