论文部分内容阅读
20世纪30、40年代以来,经济学的发展一直伴随着经济学的数学化。数学化为经济学带来了一个严谨的逻辑结构,公理化方法和依托于数学的最优化与均衡分析丰富了经济学理论、模型和学科体系,也拓展了经济学家学术研究的空间,但是,经济学也为数学化付出了沉重代价,经济学及其模型失去了对现实的解释能力,诸如一般均衡理论、新古典金融理论等都给人以虚构和“神话”的感觉。公理化方法对于以抽象事物为研究对象的数学或许是无害的,但却迫使以现实经济为研究对象的经济学作了不属于不言自明的公理的大量非现实假设,这奠定了经济学非现实性的基础。
Since the 30s and 40s of the 20th century, the development of economics has been accompanied by the mathematicalization of economics. Mathematicalization brings a rigorous logical structure to economics. The axiomatic method and the optimization and equilibrium analysis based on mathematics have enriched the theories, models and disciplines of economics and expanded the space for economists’ academic research. However, Economics has also paid a heavy price for math. Economics and its models have lost their ability to explain reality, such as general equilibrium theory and neoclassical financial theory, which all give people a sense of fiction and “mythology.” The axiomatic approach may be harmless to mathematics that takes abstract things as objects of study, but compels the economics that takes the real economy to make a myriad of non-existent assumptions that are not self-evident axioms, Sexual foundation.